Should this notice go live?
A stricter rule stops more unwanted notices. Does it hold back useful ones too? Try it, then give uncertain cases to a person.
Builder · Year 8Decision rules and human review
Choose the rule
Hold notices containing an insult. Allow the rest.
Rules run on six fixed cases. Changing a setting starts a fresh review.
Count both kinds of mistake
0 waiting for a person
Compare the rules, then try handing uncertain cases to a person.
Waiting cases are counted separately. The sample context below supplies the answer we check against.
The six sample notices
Needs a person to check
Read the context. Decide whether this particular notice belongs on the school board.
A rule simulation using six fictional notices. Nothing is published, and all links mentioned are pretend. A curriculum practice example, not student work.
What the child
is learning.
Explore the learning journeyYear 8 · Decision rules and human review
Decision rules make different kinds of mistake. Stopping more unsuitable notices can also block useful ones. An explicit review route gives a person the uncertain cases.
Now try this…
Compare both mistake counts under each rule. Then turn on human review and check both link notices. Does a review route guarantee that the person will choose correctly?